Somebody is the integration
A person reads one screen and types into another. It works, it is slow, and it stops entirely when they are on holiday.
01 AI agents & automation
A chatbot answers a question. An agent finishes the job — reads the record, checks the calendar, updates the CRM, sends the confirmation, and hands to a person when it should not decide alone.
The problem
Most businesses have already bought good software. What they have not bought is the person who moves information between it — so a human does that, all day.
A person reads one screen and types into another. It works, it is slow, and it stops entirely when they are on holiday.
A routine judgement — is this lead worth calling, does this booking fit — sits in a queue until someone gets to it.
The criteria for escalating, discounting or prioritising are real but undocumented, so they are applied inconsistently.
Doubling enquiries means doubling the admin, because none of the routine handling is automated.
How it works
Request
A task arrives — an enquiry, a record, a trigger.
Reason
The agent works out what the objective needs and which step comes next.
Tools & APIs
It calls only the functions it has been given access to.
Your data
Reads the records it needs, and nothing outside its scope.
Action
Updates, drafts or books — with approval first where it matters.
Result
Logged end to end, so every decision is reviewable.
Anything irreversible — spending, contacting a customer, deleting a record — waits for a person unless you decide otherwise.
Our approach
An agent is a language model given a specific job, a defined set of tools it may use, and clear boundaries on what it must not decide alone. The engineering is mostly in the boundaries, not the model.
Agents that do one thing well beat one that vaguely does everything. We scope narrow and expand once it is proven.
The agent can call only the functions we give it — read a record, check availability, create a draft. Nothing else is reachable.
Anything that spends money, contacts a customer or cannot be undone waits for a person unless you explicitly decide otherwise.
Every step, tool call and decision is logged, so you can see exactly why it did what it did.
What's included
Usually one agent for one workflow first, measured, then extended.
We map the real task — inputs, decisions, exceptions — including the parts nobody has written down.
Connecting the agent to your CRM, calendar, booking system, database or accounting package.
Structuring how the agent breaks a request into steps and decides which tool to use next.
Explicit limits on scope, spend, recipients and actions, enforced in code rather than in the prompt.
Review queues for the actions you want a person to sign off, with context attached.
Clear paths to a human when confidence is low or the situation is outside scope.
Giving the agent access to the records and history it needs, without exposing everything else.
A readable trace of every run, so failures are diagnosable rather than mysterious.
Testing on your actual historical data before it touches anything live.
Tracking success rate, escalation rate and cost per run after launch.
Use cases
Realistic examples. What fits your business depends on your data and process — that is what the first call establishes.
Read an incoming enquiry, check it against your criteria, enrich it from your records, route it to the right person and draft a first reply.
Check genuine availability across staff and equipment, propose slots, confirm, and update every system that needs to know.
Pull the relevant history and pricing, assemble a draft quote, and put it in front of a person to approve and send.
Monitor jobs against expected timelines, flag the ones slipping, and notify the right person with the context attached.
Read incoming invoices or forms, extract the fields, validate against records, and file or escalate.
Answer staff questions from your own documentation, with a link to the source rather than an unsourced assertion.
Technology
Tools we actually use. If your stack needs something not listed, ask — we will tell you honestly whether we can integrate with it.
Workflow & orchestration
Models & reasoning
Business systems
Data & hosting
Outcomes
Moving data between systems stops being a person's afternoon.
Routine handling happens at 2am the same way it happens at 2pm.
Criteria encoded once and applied consistently, instead of varying by who is on shift.
More enquiries handled by the same team, because the routine part is automated.
Logging reveals where the process actually breaks, which is often a surprise.
Your team spends the day on the decisions that genuinely need a human.
How it runs
Seven stages. Nothing touches live systems until it has been tested against real cases.
01
Map the workflow, the decision rules and the exceptions.
02
Define scope, tools, guardrails and the success measure in writing.
03
Integrations, reasoning, guardrails and approval paths developed and unit tested.
04
Connected to your live systems in read-only mode first.
05
Evaluated against real historical cases, running beside the manual process.
06
Enabled for real work once accuracy is demonstrated, not assumed.
07
Monitor success and escalation rates, tune, then widen scope.
Questions
If yours is not here, ask us directly — you will get a straight answer rather than a sales call.
A chatbot converses — it takes a message and returns a message. An agent takes an objective and works towards it, deciding which tools to call and in what order, then taking actions in your systems. A chatbot can tell someone your availability. An agent can check the calendar, book the slot, update the CRM and send the confirmation.
Three things. It can only call the specific functions we give it, so there is no path to anything outside scope. Anything irreversible — spending money, contacting a customer, deleting a record — sits behind human approval unless you decide otherwise. And every run is logged, so mistakes are diagnosable rather than mysterious.
No, and usually you should not. Agents work through the APIs of the tools you already run. The point is to remove the manual work between them, not to become another system of record.
We agree the measure before building — time saved, response time, escalation rate, error rate — and it runs alongside the manual process until it is demonstrably meeting it. If it does not, we say so.
Model usage is charged per token, so cost scales with volume. We estimate it during scoping using your real volumes and design the workflow to keep calls efficient. It is rarely the largest line item.
Not without your explicit agreement. We will tell you which services process your data and what their retention terms are before anything is connected.
Related AI solutions
Most projects combine two or three — an agent that runs on n8n workflows, or a chatbot that hands to a custom system.
We will tell you whether an agent can take it, what it would need access to, and roughly what it saves.